The charmonium-like exotic hadron productions in e+e- collisions at the BESIII energy with the PACIAE model

Abstract

Inspired by the BESIII observation of exotic hadron G(3900) in e+e-→ D D process [PRL 133(2024)081901], we use the parton and hadron cascade model PACIAE to simulate the productions of charmonium-like exotic hadrons including X(3872), Zc(3900)0 and G(3900) in the e+e- annihilations at s=4.95 GeV. The charmonium-like candidates are recombined by Dynamically Constrained Phase-space Coalescence model using component mesons D D (for G(3900)) or D D*/ DD* (for X(3872), Zc(3900)0 and G(3900)) in the PACIAE simulated final hadronic state. We then calculate, for the first time, the charmonium-like candidate's orbital angular momentum quantum number in its rest frame and perform the spectral classification for each of the above candidates. For G(3900), as its JPC is 1--, it is identified as the P-wave D D or D D*/ DD* state. Meanwhile, for X(3872) and Zc(3900)0, as their JPCs are, respectively, 1++ and 1+-, they are identified as the S-wave D D*/ DD* candidates. It is observed that the yield of the P-wave G(3900) composed of D D*/ DD* is significantly larger than that composed of D D. Moreover, in the D D*/ DD* channel, the yield of the P-wave G(3900) is around three times as large as the yield of the S-wave Zc(3900)0, and it is around two orders of magnitude as large as the yield of the S-wave X(3872). Finally, significant discrepancies are observed in the transverse momentum spectra and the rapidity distributions among the X(3872), Zc(3900)0 and G(3900) states. These discrepancies are proposed as valuable criteria for identifying the different charmonium-like exotic hadrons from each other.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…