Sharp Boundary Estimates and Harnack Inequalities for Fractional Porous Medium type Equations

Abstract

This paper provides sharp quantitative and constructive estimates of nonnegative solutions u(t,x)≥ 0 to the nonlinear fractional diffusion equation, ∂t u + L F(u)=0, also known as filtration equation, posed in a smooth bounded domain x∈ ⊂ RN with suitable homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Both the operator L and the nonlinearity F belong to a general class. The assumption on L are set in terms of the kernel of L and/or L-1, and allow for operators with degenerate kernel at the boundary of . The main examples of L are the three different Dirichlet Fractional Laplacians on bounded domains, and the nonlinearity can be non-homogeneous, for instance, F(u)=u2+u10. Previous result were known in the porous medium case, i.e. F(u)=|u|m-1 u with m>1. Our aim here is to perform the next step: a delicate analysis of regularity through quantitative, constructive and sharp a priori estimates. Our main results are global Harnack type inequalities H0(t,u0)\, dist(x, ∂ )a≤ F(u(t,x))≤ H1(t)\, dist(x, ∂ )b∀ (t,x)∈ (0,∞)× , where the expressions of H0, H1 and a,b are explicit and may change according to L and F. The sharpness of such estimates is proven by means of examples and counterexamples: on the one hand, we can match the powers (i.e. a=b) when the operator has a non degenerate kernel. On the other hand, when L has a kernel that degenerates at the boundary ∂, there appear an intriguing anomalous boundary behaviour: the size of the initial data determines the sharp boundary behaviour of the solution, different for ``small'' and ``large'' initial data. We conclude the paper with higher regularity results.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…