Can primordial black holes explain the overabundance of bright super-early galaxies?

Abstract

JWST is detecting an excess of high-redshift (z 10), bright galaxies challenging most theoretical predictions. To address this issue, we investigate the impact of Primordial Black Holes (PBHs) on the halo mass function and UV luminosity function (LF) of super-early galaxies. We explore two key effects: (i) the enhancement of massive halos abundance due to the compact nature and spatial distribution of PBHs, and (ii) the luminosity boost, characterized by the Eddington ratio λE, due to Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) powered by matter accretion onto PBHs. We build an effective model, calibrated using data at lower redshifts (z≈ 4-9), to derive the evolution of the LF including the additional PBH contribution. Via Bayesian analysis, we find that: (a) Although a small fraction ( f PBH ≈ -5.42) of massive ( M PBH / M ≈ 8.37), non-emitting (λE=0) PBHs can explain the galaxy excess via the halo abundance enhancement, this solution is excluded by CMB μ-distortion constraints on monochromatic PBHs. (b) If PBHs power an AGN emitting at super-Eddington luminosity (λE ≈ 10), the observed LF can be reproduced by a PBH population with characteristic mass M PBH / M ≈ 3.69 constituting a tiny ( f PBH ≈ -8.16) fraction of the cosmic dark matter content. In the AGN scenario, about 75% of the observed galaxies with MUV=-21 at z=11 should host a PBH-powered AGN and typically reside in low mass halos, Mh = 108-9 M. These predictions can be tested with available and forthcoming JWST spectroscopic data. We note that our analysis considers a lognormal PBH mass function and compares its parameters with monochromatic limits on PBH abundance. Further work is required to relax such limitations.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…