Are System Optimal Dynamic Flows Implementable by Tolls?

Abstract

A seminal result of [Fleischer et al. and Karakostas and Kolliopulos, both FOCS 2004] states that system optimal multi-commodity static network flows are always implementable as tolled Wardrop equilibrium flows even if users have heterogeneous value-of-time sensitivities. Their proof uses LP-duality to characterize the general implementability of network flows by tolls. For the much more complex setting of dynamic flows, [Graf et al., SODA 2025] identified necessary and sufficient conditions for a dynamic s-d flow to be implementable as a tolled dynamic equilibrium. They used the machinery of (infinite-dimensional) strong duality to obtain their characterizations. Their work, however, does not answer the question of whether system optimal dynamic network flows are implementable by tolls. We consider this question for a general dynamic flow model involving multiple commodities with individual source-destination pairs, fixed inflow rates and heterogeneous valuations of travel time and money spent. We present both a positive and a, perhaps surprising, negative result: For the negative result, we provide a network with multiple source and destination pairs in which under the Vickrey queuing model no system optimal flow is implementable -- even if all users value travel times and spent money the same. Our counter-example even shows that the ratio of the achievable equilibrium travel times by using tolls and of the system optimal travel times can be unbounded. For the single-source, single-destination case, we show that if the traversal time functions are suitably well-behaved (as is the case, for example, in the Vickrey queuing model), any system optimal flow is implementable.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…