On restricted sumsets with bounded degree relations

Abstract

Given two subsets A, B ⊂eq Fp and a binary relation R ⊂eq A × B, the restricted sumset of A, B with respect to R is defined as A +R B = \ a+b (a,b) R \. When R is taken as the equality relation, determining the minimum value of |A +R B| is the famous Erdos--Heilbronn problem, which was solved separately by Dias da Silva, Hamidoune and Alon, Nathanson and Ruzsa. Lev later conjectured that if A, B ⊂eq Fp with |A| + |B| p and R is a matching between subsets of A and B, then |A +R B| |A| + |B| - 3. We confirm this conjecture in the case where |A| + |B| (1-)p for any > 0, provided that p > p0 for some sufficiently large p0 depending only on . Our proof builds on a recent work by Bollob\'as, Leader, and Tiba, and a rectifiability argument developed by Green and Ruzsa. Furthermore, our method extends to cases when R is a degree-bounded relation, either on both sides A and B or solely on the smaller set. In addition, we construct subsets A ⊂eq Fp with |A| = 6p11 - O(1) such that |A +R A| = p-3 for any prime number p, where R is a matching on A. This extends an earlier construction by Lev and highlights a distinction between the combinatorial notion of the restricted sumset and the classcial Erdos--Heilbronn problem, where |A +R A| p holds given R = \(a,a) a ∈ A\ is the equality relation on A and |A| p+32.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…