Availability is all you need: achieving optimal regret with minimal information for dynamic matching

Abstract

We study a centralized discrete-time dynamic two-way matching model with finitely many agent types. Agents arrive stochastically over time and join their type-dedicated queues waiting to be matched. We focus on availability-based policies that make matching decisions based solely on agent availability across types (i.e., whether queues are empty or not), rather than relying on complete queue-length information (e.g., the longest-queue policy). We aim to achieve constant regret at all times with optimal scaling in terms of the general position gap, ε, which measures the distance of the fluid relaxation from degeneracy. We classify availability-based policies into global and local policies based on the scope of information they utilize. First, for general networks (possibly cyclic), we propose a global availability-based policy, probabilistic matching, and prove that it achieves the optimal all-time regret scaling of O(ε-1), matching the known lower bound established by [KAG24]. Second, for acyclic networks, we focus on the class of local availability-based policies, specifically static priority policies that prioritize matches based on a fixed order. Within this class, we derive the first explicit regret bound for the previously proposed tree priority policy, showing all-time regret scaling of O(ε-(d+1)/2), where d is the network depth. Next, we introduce a new truncated tree priority policy and prove that it is the first static priority policy to achieve the optimal all-time regret scaling of O(ε-1). These policies are appealing for matching systems such as queueing and load balancing; they reduce operational costs by using minimal information while effectively balancing the trade-off between immediate and future rewards.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…