Revisiting Bc- J/ (ηc) L- decays within the SM and beyond in QCD factorization

Abstract

Motivated by the deviations observed between the data and the SM predictions of B(Bs0 Ds+ π-) and B(Bd0 D+ K-), we revisit the Bc- J/(ηc) L- decays, with L=π, K(*), , both within the SM and beyond. Since these processes are also mediated by b c u d(s) transitions and hence dominated by the colour-allowed tree topology, the QCD factorization (QCDF) is expected to hold in the heavy-quark limit. Firstly, we update the SM predictions of these decays by including the nonfactorizable vertex corrections up to the NNLO in αs. It is found that, relative to the LO results, the branching ratios of these decays up to the NLO and NNLO corrections are always enhanced, with a relative amount given by δNLO = (BNLO-BLO)/BLO ≈ +6\% and δNNLO = (BNNLO-BLO)/BLO ≈ +9\%, respectively. To minimize the uncertainties brought by Vcb and the transition form factors, we construct the ratios RJ/(ηc) L, R(s)L(), and Rπ/μμ, which are then used to constrain the model-independent new physics (NP) Wilson coefficients. After considering the latest Belle data and the updated B(s) D(s)(*) form factors, we find that the deviations can still be explained by the NP four-quark operators with (1+γ5) (1-γ5) and (1+γ5) (1+γ5) structures, while the solution with γμ (1+γ5) γμ (1-γ5) structure does not work anymore, under the combined constraints from R(s)L() at the 2σ level. Furthermore, the ratio Rπ/μμ, once measured precisely, could provide complementary constraint.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…