Scale and redshift dependent limits on cosmic neutrino properties

Abstract

Cosmological neutrino mass and abundance measurements are reaching unprecedented precision. Testing their stability versus redshift and scale is a crucial issue, as it can serve as a guide for optimizing ongoing and future searches. Here, we perform such analyses, considering a number of redshift, scale, and redshift-and-scale nodes. Concerning the k-space analysis of Σ m, CMB observations are crucial, as they lead the neutrino mass constraints. Interestingly, some data combinations suggest a non-zero value for the neutrino mass with 2σ significance. The most constraining bound we find is Σ m<0.54 eV at 95\% CL in the [10-3, 10-2] h/Mpc k-bin, a limit that barely depends on the data combination. Regarding the redshift- and scale-dependent neutrino mass constraints, high redshifts (z>100) and scales in the range [10-3, 10-1] h/Mpc provide the best constraints. The least constraining bounds are obtained at very low redshifts [0,0.5] and also at very small scales (k>0.1\, h/Mpc), due to the absence of observations. Highly relevant is the case of the [100, 1100], [10-2, 10-1] h/Mpc redshift-scale bin, where a 2-3σ evidence for a non-zero neutrino mass is obtained for all data combinations. The bound from CMB alone at 68\% CL is 0.63+0.20-0.24 eV, and the one for the full dataset is 0.56+0.20-0.23 eV, clearly suggesting a non-zero neutrino mass at these scales, possibly related to a deviation of the ISW amplitude in this redshift range. Concerning the analysis of N eff in the k-space, at intermediate scales ranging from k=10-3 h/Mpc to k=10-1 h/Mpc, accurate CMB data provide very strong bounds, the most robust one being N eff=3.09 0.14, comparable to the standard expected value without a k-bin analysis. [abridged]

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…