A Spectral Lower Bound on Chromatic Numbers using p-Energy

Abstract

Let AG be the adjacency matrix of a simple graph G , and let χ(G) , χf(G) , χq(G) , ξ(G) and ξf(G) denote its chromatic number, fractional chromatic number, quantum chromatic number, orthogonal rank and projective rank, respectively. For p ≥ 0 , we define the positive and negative p -energies of G by Ep+(G) = Σλi > 0 λip, Ep-(G) = Σλi < 0 |λi|p, where λ1 ≥ ·s ≥ λn are the eigenvalues of AG . We prove that for all p ≥ 0 , χ(G) ≥ \χf(G), χq(G), ξ(G) \ ≥ ξf(G) ≥ 1 + \ Ep+(G)Ep-(G), Ep-(G)Ep+(G) \1|p - 1|. This result unifies and strengthens a series of existing bounds corresponding to the cases p ∈ \0, 2, ∞\ . In particular, the case p = 0 yields the inertia bound χf(G) ≥ ξf(G) ≥1 + \n+n-, n-n+\, where n+ and n- denote the number of positive and negative eigenvalues of AG , respectively. This resolves two conjectures of Elphick and Wocjan. We also demonstrate that for certain graphs, non-integer values of p provide sharper lower bounds than existing spectral bounds. As an example, we determine χq for the Tilley graph, which cannot be achieved using existing (unweighted) p-energy bounds. Our proof employs a novel synthesis of linear algebra and measure-theoretic tools, which allows us to surpass existing spectral bounds.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…