Joint Analysis of Constraints on f(R) Parametrization from Recent Cosmological Observations
Abstract
In this study, we present constraints on the parameters of three well-known f(R) gravity models, viz. (i) Hu-Sawicki, (ii) Starobinsky, and (iii) ArcTanh by using a joint analysis of recent cosmological observations. We perform analytical approximations for the Hubble parameter, H(z), and cosmological distances in terms of the Hubble constant (H0), matter density (m0), and a deviation parameter b for each model. Our analysis combines early and late-universe cosmological data from five cosmological observations: (a) Hubble parameter measurements (Cosmic Chronometers), (b) Type Ia Supernovae (Union 3.0), (c) Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (DESI-2025), (d) Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and (e) Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). We first optimize the models using each dataset independently, and subsequently, we perform a comprehensive joint analysis combining all four datasets. Our results show that the Hu-Sawicki and ArcTanh models do not deviate significantly from the model at 95% confidence level for individual datasets and remain consistent at 99% confidence level in the joint analysis. In contrast, the Starobinsky model shows a strong deviation and appears as a viable alternative to . We also constrain the transition redshift parameter (zt), and check that the obtained value agrees with the values inferred from both early-time measurement (Planck) and late-time data from Type Ia Supernovae. These results support the potential support of f(R) gravity to explain the late-time cosmic acceleration effectively. Finally, a statistical model comparison using 2min, AIC, and BIC indicates that all three f(R) models are favored over , with the Starobinsky model receiving very strong support.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.