A search for Bs0* and B*s1 through the K-p interaction

Abstract

Studying heavy-quark hadrons is crucial due to the nonperturbative nature of low-energy QCD, with Heavy-Quark Symmetry (HQS) serving as a key framework for understanding their spin and flavor symmetries. However, a key issue is that the theoretically expected B(*)K molecular states have not yet been observed, although they are considered the bottom-quark counterparts of the observed D(*)K molecular states (corresponding to Ds0(2317/2460)-), which challenges the universality of HQS. The main goal of this work is to search for the theoretically predicted BK and B*K molecular states, namely Bs0*(5725) and Bs1*(5778), via the reactions K-p b0 Bs0* and K-p b0 Bs1*. Within an effective Lagrangian framework, we compute the relevant cross sections, considering t-channel B(*) exchanges and K-p initial-state interactions (ISI). The results show that the production cross sections of Bs0*(5725) and Bs1*(5778) can reach the order of 0.01~nb, and we suggest that experiments searching for Bs0*(5725) are best performed at PK- = 12.18~GeV, while higher energies are most favorable for producing Bs1*(5778). The ISI play a crucial role, as they not only significantly enhance the production cross sections of Bs0*(5725) and Bs1*(5778) (by roughly one order of magnitude) but also markedly affect the angular distributions of the produced particles. We also calculated the production cross sections of the conventional quark-antiquark states Bs0*(5700) and Bs1*(5720), which are found to be nearly the same as those of Bs0*(5725) and Bs1*(5778). Although their internal structures remain ambiguous, these results can inform future experimental searches at CERN and J-PARC.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…