Sharp lower error bounds for strong approximation of SDEs with a drift coefficient of Hölder or Sobolev regularity using a Weierstraß scale

Abstract

We study strong approximation of solutions of SDEs with bounded α-Hölder continuous drift coefficient and constant diffusion coefficient at time point 1. Recently, it was shown in [arXiv:1909.07961v4 (2021)] that for such SDEs the equidistant Euler scheme achieves an Lp-error rate of at least (1+α)/2, up to an arbitrary small , for all p≥ 1 and α∈ (0,1], in terms of the number of evaluations of the driving Brownian motion W. In this article, we prove a matching lower error bound for α∈ (0,1). More precisely, we show that for every α∈ (0,1), the Lp-error rate (1+α)/2 of the Euler scheme in [arXiv:1909.07961v4 (2021)] cannot be improved in general by any numerical method based on finitely many evaluations of W in [0,1]. Up to now, this result was known only for α=1. Even stronger, an Lp-error rate better than (1+α)/2 cannot be achieved, even if algorithms additionally use a finite number of time integrals of W. Thus, Wagner-Platen type schemes are not superior to the Euler scheme. Additionally, we extend a result from [arXiv:2402.13732v2 (2024)] on final time approximation of SDEs with a bounded drift coefficient of fractional Sobolev regularity α∈ (0,1). We prove that for every α∈ (0,1), the Lp-error rate (1+ α)/2 shown in [arXiv:2101.12185v2 (2022)] for the equidistant Euler scheme can essentially not be improved by any numerical method based on finitely many evaluations and time integrals of W in [0,1]. This lower bound was known from [arXiv:2402.13732v2 (2024)] only for α∈ (1/2,1), p=2 and numerical methods based on finitely many evaluations of W. For the proof of our results we use variants of the Weierstrass function as a drift coefficient and we extend the coupling of noise technique introduced in [arXiv:2010.00915v1 (2020)].

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…