On estimating Schatten norm and power distances between quantum states

Abstract

We study the computational complexity of estimating the quantum Schatten α-norm distance Tα(ρ0,ρ1), given poly(n)-size state-preparation circuits of n-qubit quantum states ρ0 and ρ1. This quantity serves as a lower bound on the trace distance and, for α> 1, is interchangeable with its powered version Λα(ρ0,ρ1). For any constant α> 1, we develop an efficient rank-independent quantum estimator for Tα(ρ0,ρ1) with time complexity poly(n), achieving an exponential speedup over the prior best results of (n) due to Wang, Guan, Liu, Zhang, and Ying (TIT 2024). When 0<α<1 is a constant, the quantum Schatten α-power distance Λα(ρ0,ρ1) becomes a distance metric. Accordingly, we provide a rank-efficient quantum estimator for this quantity. Our quantum algorithm reveals a dichotomy in the computational complexity of the Quantum State Distinguishability Problem with Schatten α-norm (QSD α), which involves deciding whether Tα(ρ0,ρ1) is at least 2/5 or at most 1/5. This dichotomy arises between the cases of α> 1 and 0 < α≤ 1: 1. For any constant α>1, QSDα is BQP-complete. 2. For any 1 ≤ α(n) ≤ 1+ negl(n), QSDα is QSZK-complete, implying that no efficient quantum estimator for Tα(ρ0,ρ1) exists unless BQP= QSZK. This QSZK-hardness result also extends to the promise problem defined by Λα(ρ0,ρ1) for constant 0<α<1. The hardness results follow from reductions based on new rank-dependent inequalities for Tα(ρ0,ρ1) when 1≤ α≤ ∞ and for Λα(ρ0,ρ1) when 0<α<1, which are of independent interest.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…