A Counterexample to a Conjecture of Lov\'asz
Abstract
In 1975 Lov\'asz conjectured that every r-partite, r-uniform hypergraph contains r-1 vertices whose deletion reduces the matching number. If true, this statement would imply a well-known conjecture of Ryser from 1971, which states that every r-partite, r-uniform hypergraph has a vertex cover of size at most r-1 times its matching number. When r=2, Ryser's conjecture is simply Konig's theorem, and the conjecture of Lov\'asz is an immediate corollary. Ryser's conjecture for r=3 was proven by Aharoni in 2001, and remains open for all r≥ 4. Here we show that the conjecture of Lov\'asz is false in the case r=3. Our counterexample is the line hypergraph of the Biggs-Smith graph, a highly symmetric cubic graph on 102 vertices.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.