EMoE: Training-Free Expert Disagreement for Uncertainty-Aware Text-to-Image Diffusion

Abstract

Large text-to-image diffusion models rarely expose reliable signals of when a prompt is likely to produce a poorly aligned generation, especially when training data is undisclosed. We study whether expert disagreement inside pre-trained mixture-of-experts (MoE) diffusion models can serve as a reliable estimate for epistemic uncertainty. We introduce EMoE, a training-free method that separates expert-specific computation paths at an early MoE layer, uses the same initial noise across paths, and measures variance among their latent representations after the first denoising step. This provides an uncertainty-aware prompt signal before full image generation, without auxiliary networks or training diffusion ensembles. On COCO and CC3M, EMoE ranks prompts by text-image alignment quality metrics more consistently than diffusion-specific and router-based baselines. We further apply EMoE to multilingual prompts and find systematic language-dependent differences in disagreement and generation quality, including shared-vocabulary effects. These results position EMoE as a practical diagnostic tool for prompt risk, model coverage, and bias analysis in MoE text-to-image diffusion models.