Cobordism Utopia: U-Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland

Abstract

The U-dualities of maximally supersymmetric supergravity theories lead to celebrated non-perturbative constraints on the structure of quantum gravity. They can also lead to the presence of global symmetries since manifolds equipped with non-trivial duality bundles can carry topological charges captured by non-trivial elements of bordism groups. The recently proposed Swampland Cobordism Conjecture thus predicts the existence of new singular objects absent in the low-energy supergravity theory, which break these global symmetries. We investigate this expectation in two directions, involving the different choices of U-duality groups GU, as well as k, the dimension of the closed manifold carrying the topological charge. First, we compute for all supergravity theories in dimension 3 ≤ D ≤ 11 the bordism groups 1Spin(BGU). Second, we treat in detail the case of D = 8, computing all relevant bordism groups kSpin(BGU) for 1 ≤ k ≤ 7. In all cases, we identify corresponding string, M-, or F-theory backgrounds which implement the required U-duality defects. In particular, we find that in some cases there is no purely geometric background available which implements the required symmetry-breaking defect. This includes non-geometric twists as well as non-geometric strings and instantons. This computation involves several novel computations of the bordism groups for GU = SL(2,Z) × SL(3,Z), which localizes at primes p=2,3. Whereas an amalgamated product structure greatly simplifies the calculation of purely SL(2,Z) bundles, this does not extend to SL(3,Z). Rather, we leverage the appearance of product / ring structures induced from cyclic subgroups of GU which naturally act on the relevant bordism groups.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…