Impossibility Results for Strong Linearizability: The Difficulty of Consistent Refereeing

Abstract

This paper studies the relation between agreement and strongly linearizable implementations of various objects. This leads to new results about implementations of concurrent objects from various primitives including window registers, interfering primitives and stacks. We identify that lock-free, respectively, wait-free, strongly linearizable implementations of several concurrent objects entail a form of agreement that does not require full consensus but cannot be implemented in a strongly-linearizable manner with combinations of non-universal primitives. In both cases, lock-free and wait-free, this form of agreement requires a distinguished process to referee a competition that involves all other processes. Our results show that consistent refereeing of such competitions (i.e., once resolved, the outcome cannot be revised in any extension of the execution) requires high coordination power. More specifically, two contest objects are defined and used to help characterize coordination constraints imposed by strong linearizability in lock-free and wait-free implementations, respectively. Both objects are strictly weaker than consensus, in the sense that they have a wait-free linearizable (in fact, decisively linearizable) implementation from reads and writes. The contest objects capture strong linearizability in two complementary ways. First, they admit strongly linearizable implementations from several high-level objects such as queues, snapshots, and counters, so impossibility results for the contest objects immediately carry over to these objects. Second, they admit powerful impossibility results for strong linearizability that involve window registers, interfering primitives and stacks, which are non-universal.