Solution to a problem on isolation of 3-vertex paths

Abstract

The 3-path isolation number of a connected n-vertex graph G, denoted by (G,P3), is the size of a smallest subset D of the vertex set of G such that the closed neighbourhood N[D] of D in G intersects each 3-vertex path of G, meaning that no two edges of G-N[D] intersect. Zhang and Wu proved that (G,P3) ≤ 2n/7 unless G is a 3-path or a 3-cycle or a 6-cycle. The bound is attained by infinitely many graphs having induced 6-cycles. Huang, Zhang and Jin proved that if G has no 6-cycles, or G has no induced 5-cycles and no induced 6-cycles, then (G, P3) ≤ n/4 unless G is a 3-path or a 3-cycle or a 7-cycle or an 11-cycle. They asked if the bound still holds asymptotically for connected graphs having no induced 6-cycles. More precisely, taking f(n) to be the maximum value of (G,P3) over all connected n-vertex graphs G having no induced 6-cycles, their question is whether n ∞f(n)n = 14. We verify this by proving that f(n) = (n+1)/4 . The proof hinges on further proving that if G is such a graph and (G, P3) = (n+1)/4, then (G-v, P3) < (G, P3) for each vertex v of G. This new idea promises to be of further use. We also prove that if the maximum degree of such a graph G is at least 5, then (G,P3) ≤ n/4.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…