Catching Rats in H-minor-free Graphs

Abstract

We show that every H-minor-free graph that also excludes a (k × k)-grid as a minor has treewidth/branchwidth bounded from above by a function f(t,k) that is linear in k and polynomial in t := |V(H)|. Such a result was proven originally by [Demaine & Hajiaghayi, Combinatorica, 2008], where f was indeed linear in k. However the dependency in t in this result was non-explicit (and huge). Later, [Kawarabayashi & Kobayashi, JCTB, 2020] showed that this bound can be estimated to be f(t,k)∈ 2O(t t) · k. Wood recently asked whether f can be pushed further to be polynomial, while maintaining the linearity on k. We answer this in a particularly strong sense, by showing that the treewidth/branchwidth of G is in O(gk + t2304), where g is the Euler genus of H. This directly yields f(t,k)= O(t2k + t2304). Our methods build on techniques for branchwidth and on new bounds and insights for the Graph Minor Structure Theorem (GMST) due to [Gorsky, Seweryn & Wiederrecht, 2025, arXiv:2504.02532]. In particular, we prove a variant of the GMST that ensures some helpful properties for the minor relation. We further employ our methods to provide approximation algorithms for the treewidth/branchwidth of H-minor-free graphs. In particular, for every > 0 and every t-vertex graph H with Euler genus g, we give a (g + )-approximation algorithm for the branchwidth of H-minor-free graphs running in 2poly(t) / · poly(n)-time. Our algorithms explicitly return either an appropriate branch-decomposition or a grid-minor certifying a negative answer.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…