Investigating the Fermi-Hubbard model by the tensor-backflow method

Abstract

We apply the Tensor-Backflow method to investigate the Fermi-Hubbard model on two-dimensional lattices up to 256 sites, exploring various interaction strengths U, electron fillings n, next-nearest-neighbor hopping t', and boundary conditions. By considering backflow terms from nearest- or next-nearest-neighbor sites, we achieve competitive results without enforcing geometric symmetries on the variational wave-function. The optimizations were stable from a prior unrestrictied Hartree-Fock state, followed by adding backflow corrections. Meanwhile, changing interaction strengths in the prior unrestrictied Hartree-Fock state is helpful to bypass the local minima. When t'=0, by considering nearest-neighbor backflow terms, linear stripe order emerges successfully for the case of n=0.875 and U=8 on a 16 × 16 lattice with periodic boundary conditions. In a similar case with open boundary conditions, the energy obtained is only 4.5 × 10-4 higher than the state-of-the-art method fPEPS with bond dimension D=20. Compared to state-of-the-art neural network methods, the energies obtained using the Tensor-Backflow approach are competitive, with relative errors below 5 × 10-3. For n=0.8 and n=0.9375, direct optimizations yield results consistent with the phase diagram from AFQMC. When t'=-0.2, considering next-nearest-neighbor backflow terms leads to energies that are either competitive with or even lower than those from state-of-the-art neural network approaches. For instance, for n=0.875 and U=8 on a 12 × 12 lattice with periodic boundary conditions, the energy obtained is 8.1 × 10-4 lower than that from the neural network result. Thus, the Tensor-Backflow method demonstrates strong representational capabilities for solving the Fermi-Hubbard model.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…