Probing Binary Architectures of Lithium-Rich Giants in GALAH with COSMIC and Stellar Models

Abstract

Surface lithium is depleted when a star goes through the first dredge-up phase, yet 1\% of red giants are found to be Li-rich. The formation mechanism for these remains uncertain. We combine observational constraints from GALAH Li-rich giants, with the binary population synthesis code COSMIC to investigate system properties of these objects assuming binary mass transfer. By evolving 9 million binary systems, we find that binary histories most consistent with observational constraints are mass transfer from an intermediate-mass AGB donor to a main-sequence star now observed as a Li-rich red giant. In GALAH, 9\% of main-sequence stars have A(Li)=2.5-3.2 dex making it plausible to create red giants with A(Li)=1.5-2.2 \; dex via main-sequence mass transfer, but cannot explain the more enriched giants A(Li) 2.2 \; dex. Nucleosynthetic yields from stellar models show that AGB stars with initial masses of 4.25-5 \; M and 8 \; M contain the most Li in their ejecta. Intermediate-mass AGB stars comprise 29\% of COSMIC results, with present-day separations s=3.30.5 \; AU and mass ratios q=0.5-1.6. We achieve 95\% agreement in mean enhancements in (Ba, Y) between GALAH observations and stellar models of 6 and 8 \; M AGB, assuming 1\% mass transfer efficiency. We find a low mass transfer efficiency best reproduces GALAH observations suggesting that the preferred mass transfer mechanism for Li-enrichment is via wind Roche Lobe Overflow. While we constrain the most plausible binary parameters assuming AGB mass transfer creates Li-rich giants, discrepancies in nucleosynthesis comparisons, and the small fraction of Li-enhanced main-sequence stars suggests additional enrichment mechanisms are likely.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…