On the Nature of Stationary Integral Varifolds near Multiplicity 2 Planes

Abstract

We study stationary integral n-varifolds V in the unit ball B1(0)⊂Rn+k. Allard's regularity theorem establishes the existence of ε = ε(n,k)∈ (0,1) for which if V is ε-close (as varifolds) to the plane P0 = \0\k×Rn with multiplicity 1 then, in B1/2(0), V is represented by a single C1,α minimal graph. However, when instead P0 occurs with multiplicity Q∈ \2,3,…c\, simple examples show that this conclusion, now as a multi-valued graph, may fail, even if V corresponds to an area-minimising rectifiable current. In the present work we investigate the structure of such V which are close to planes with multiplicity Q>1, focusing primarily on the case Q=2. We show that an ε-regularity theorem holds when V is close, as a varifold, to P0 with multiplicity 2, provided V satisfies a certain topological structural condition on the part of its support where the density of V is <2. The conclusion then is that, in B1/2(0), V is represented by the graph of a Lipschitz 2-valued function over P0 with small Lipschitz constant; in fact, the function is C1,α in a precise generalised sense, and satisfies estimates, implying that all tangent cones at singular points in B1/2(0) are unique and comprised of stationary unions of 4 half-planes (which may form a union of two distinct planes or a single multiplicity 2 plane). The theorem does not require any additional assumption on the part of V with density ≥ 2 (which a priori may be a relatively large set in Hn-measure with high topological complexity). As a corollary, we show that our ε-regularity theorem applies unconditionally to stationary 2-valued Lipschitz graphs with arbitrary Lipschitz constant, yielding improved regularity and uniform a priori estimates.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…