Bridging Scales in Black Hole Accretion and Feedback: Relativistic Jet linking the Horizon to the Host Galaxy

Abstract

Simulating black hole (BH) accretion and feedback from the horizon to galactic scales is extremely challenging, as it involves a vast range of scales. Recently, our multizone method has successfully achieved global dynamical steady-states of hot accretion flows in three-dimensional general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations by tracking the bidirectional interaction between a non-spinning BH and its host galaxy. In this paper, we present technical improvements to the method and apply it to spin a*=0.9 BHs, which power relativistic jets. We first test the new multizone set-up with a smaller Bondi radius, RB≈400\,rg, where rg is the gravitational radius. The strongly magnetized accretion launches a relativistic jet with an intermediate feedback efficiency η30\,\%, in between that of a prograde (η100\,\%) and retrograde (η 10\,\%) torus. Interestingly, both prograde and retrograde simulations also eventually converge to the same intermediate efficiency when evolved long enough, as accumulated magnetic fields remove gas rotation. We then extend strongly magnetized simulations to larger Bondi radii, RB≈ 2×103,~2× 104,~2× 105\,rg. We find that the BH accretion rate M is suppressed with respect to the Bondi rate MB as M/MB RB-1/2. However, despite some variability, the time-averaged feedback efficiency is η30\,\%, independent of RB. This suggests that BH feedback efficiency in hot accretion flows is mainly governed by the BH spin (a*) rather than by the galactic properties (RB). From these first-principles simulations, we provide a feedback subgrid prescription for cosmological simulations: E fb=2×10-3[RB/(2×105\,rg)]-1/2MBc2 for BH spin a*=0.9.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…