On universal graphs for trees and treewidth k graphs

Abstract

Let s(n) be the minimum number of edges in a graph that contains every n-vertex tree as a subgraph. Chung and Graham [J. London Math. Soc. 1983] claim to prove that s(n)≤slant O(n n). We point out a mistake in their proof. The previously best known upper bound is s(n)≤slant O(n( n)( n)2) by Chung, Graham and Pippenger [Proc. Hungarian Coll. on Combinatorics 1976], the proof of which is missing many crucial details. We give a fully self-contained proof of the new and improved upper bound s(n)≤slant O(n( n)( n)). The best known lower bound is s(n)≥slant (n n). We generalise these results for graphs of treewidth k. For an integer k≥slant 1, let sk(n) be the minimum number of edges in a graph that contains every n-vertex graph with treewidth k as a subgraph. So s(n)=s1(n). We show that (k n n) ≤slant sk(n) ≤slant O(kn( n)( n)).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…