A Conditional Reduction of the Rational Hodge Conjecture for Threefolds and Deformation-Theoretic Verifications in Several Families

Abstract

We formulate a concrete geometric approximation hypothesis (Hypothesis~BB) asserting that codimension-2 Hodge classes on a smooth projective threefold can be realized as specializations of families whose general members are complete-intersection curves. We prove that Hypothesis~BB implies the (rational) Hodge conjecture for the threefold. We then give deformation-theoretic sufficient criteria (cohomology-vanishing and surjectivity conditions) which imply Hypothesis~BB, and we prove these criteria hold for the class of a line on a general quintic threefold containing that line. We further formulate and prove several propositions showing that, under natural Noether--Lefschetz and unobstructedness hypotheses, Hypothesis~BB holds generically in families of Calabi--Yau and Fano threefolds; these propositions reduce the problem to checkable conditions (normal-bundle cohomology, surjectivity of restriction maps). Finally, we include a Macaulay2 appendix with scripts to verify the required cohomology and splitting conditions in explicit examples.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…