Jacobian Ideals of Hyperplane Arrangements and their Graded Betti Numbers

Abstract

A hyperplane arrangement is said to be free if the corresponding Jacobian ideal J is Cohen-Macaulay. If is free then J is unmixed (i.e. equidimensional). Freeness is an important property, yet its presence is not well understood. A conjecture of Terao says that freeness of depends only on the intersection lattice of . Given an arrangement , we define the ideal Jtop to be the intersection of the codimension 2 primary components of J. This ideal is unmixed, but not necessarily Cohen-Macaulay; if is free then J = Jtop. We develop a new method for studying the ideals J and Jtop and establish results in the spirit of Terao's conjecture, focusing on Jtop rather than J. It is based on a new application of liaison theory, the general residual of . This residual ideal defines a scheme with surprisingly simple properties. These allow us to track back to Jtop. Extending earlier results with Schenck, we identify mild conditions on a hyperplane arrangement which imply that the Hilbert function of ( f)top or even its graded Betti numbers, are determined by the intersection lattice of . We establish new bounds on the global Tjurina number of a hyperplane arrangement. For line arrangements, we show that the graded Betti numbers of ( f)sat determine the graded Betti numbers of ( f), and of the corresponding Milnor module Jsat/J. We obtain a new freeness criterion for line arrangements -- it highlights the fact that free line arrangements are special by proving that a related codimension two ideal has the least possible number of generators, namely two, if and only if is free. We illustrate our results by computing the graded Betti numbers for a number of basic arrangements that were not accessible with previous methods.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…