Longest odd cycles in non-bipartite C2k+1-free graphs

Abstract

In strengthening a result of Andr\'asfai, Erdos and S\'os in 1974, H\"aggkvist proved that if G is an n-vertex C2k+1-free graph with minimum degree δ(G)>2n2k+3 and n>k+22(2k+3)(3k+2), then G contains no odd cycle of length greater than k+12. This result has many applications.In this paper, we consider a similar problem by replacing minimum degree condition with edge number condition. We prove that for integers n,k,r with k≥ 2,3≤ r≤ 2k and n ≥ 2(r+2)(r+1)(r+2k), if G is an n-vertex C2k+1-free graph with e(G) ≥ (n-r+1)24+r2, then G contains no odd cycle of length greater than r. The construction shows that the result is best possible. This extends a result of Brandt [Discrete Applied Mathematics 79 (1997)], and a result of Bollob\'as and Thomason [Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. 77 (1999)], and a result of Caccetta and Jia [Graphs Combin. 18 (2002)] and independently proving by Lin, Ning and Wu [Combin. Probab. Comput. 30 (2021)]. Recently, Ren, Wang, Yang, and the second author [SIAM J. Discrete Math. 38 (2024)] show that for 3≤ r≤ 2k and n≥ 318(r-2)2k, every n-vertex C2k+1-free graph with e(G) ≥ (n-r+1)24+r2 can be made bipartite by deleting at most r-2 vertices or deleting at most r22+r22 edges. As an application, we derive this result and provide a simple proof.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…