Spectral Refutations of Semirandom k-LIN over Larger Fields
Abstract
We study the problem of strongly refuting semirandom k-LIN(F) instances: systems of k-sparse inhomogeneous linear equations over a finite field F. For the case of F = F2, this is the well-studied problem of refuting semirandom instances of k-XOR, where the works of [GKM22,HKM23] establish a tight trade-off between runtime and clause density for refutation: for any choice of a parameter , they give an nO()-time algorithm to certify that there is no assignment that can satisfy more than 12 + -fraction of constraints in a semirandom k-XOR instance, provided that the instance has O(n) · (n)k/2 - 1 n /4 constraints, and the work of [KMOW17] provides good evidence that this tight up to a polylog(n) factor via lower bounds for the Sum-of-Squares hierarchy. However for larger fields, the only known results for this problem are established via black-box reductions to the case of F2, resulting in an |F|3k gap between the current best upper and lower bounds. In this paper, we give an algorithm for refuting semirandom k-LIN(F) instances with the "correct" dependence on the field size |F|. For any choice of a parameter , our algorithm runs in (|F|n)O()-time and strongly refutes semirandom k-LIN(F) instances with at least O(n) · (|F*| n)k/2 - 1 (n |F*|) /4 constraints. We give good evidence that this dependence on the field size |F| is optimal by proving a lower bound for the Sum-of-Squares hierarchy that matches this threshold up to a polylog(n |F*|) factor. Our results also extend to the more general case of finite Abelian groups.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.