A Composition-Based Approach to EKR Problems

Abstract

Let A be a family of subsets of a finite set. A subfamily of A is said to be intersecting when any two of its members contain at least one common element. We say that A is an Erd os-Ko-Rado (EKR) family if, for every element x of the set, the subfamily consisting of all members of A that contain x has the maximum cardinality among all intersecting subfamilies of A. If these subfamilies are the only maximum intersecting subfamilies of A, then A is called a strong EKR family. In this article, we introduce a compositional framework to establish the EKR and strong EKR properties in set systems when some subfamilies are known to satisfy the EKR or strong EKR properties. Our method is powerful enough to yield simpler proofs for several existing results, including those derived from Katona's cycle method (1968), Borg and Meagher's admissible ordering method (2016), related results on the family of permutations studied by Frankl and Deza (1977) and the family of perfect matchings of complete graphs of even order investigated by Meagher and Moura (2005). To demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of our method when other existing methods have not been successful, we show that for every fixed r-uniform hypergraph H and all sufficiently large integers n, the family of all subhypergraphs of the complete r-uniform hypergraph on n vertices that are isomorphic to H satisfies the strong EKR property, where two copies of H are considered intersecting if they share at least one common hyperedge. Moreover, when the structural constraint H is restricted to be a cycle, we establish a series of EKR results for families of cycles in the complete graph Kn and the complete bipartite graph Kn,n for a broad range of the parameter n.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…