Un cadre paraconsistant pour l'\'evaluation de similarit\'e dans les bases de connaissances
Abstract
This article proposes a paraconsistent framework for evaluating similarity in knowledge bases. Unlike classical approaches, this framework explicitly integrates contradictions, enabling a more robust and interpretable similarity measure. A new measure S* is introduced, which penalizes inconsistencies while rewarding shared properties. Paraconsistent super-categories K* are defined to hierarchically organize knowledge entities. The model also includes a contradiction extractor E and a repair mechanism, ensuring consistency in the evaluations. Theoretical results guarantee reflexivity, symmetry, and boundedness of S* . This approach offers a promising solution for managing conflicting knowledge, with perspectives in multi-agent systems.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.