Fine-Grained Classification Of Detecting Dominating Patterns

Abstract

We consider the following generalization of dominating sets: Let G be a host graph and P be a pattern graph P. A dominating P-pattern in G is a subset S of vertices in G that (1) forms a dominating set in G and (2) induces a subgraph isomorphic to P. The graph theory literature studies the properties of dominating P-patterns for various patterns P, including cliques, matchings, independent sets, cycles and paths. Previous work (Kunnemann, Redzic 2024) obtains algorithms and conditional lower bounds for detecting dominating P-patterns particularly for P being a k-clique, a k-independent set and a k-matching. Their results give conditionally tight lower bounds if k is sufficiently large (where the bound depends the matrix multiplication exponent ω). We ask: Can we obtain a classification of the fine-grained complexity for all patterns P? Indeed, we define a graph parameter (P) such that if ω=2, then \[ (n(P) m|V(P)|-(P)2)1 o(1) \] is the optimal running time assuming the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis, for all patterns P except the triangle K3. Here, the host graph G has n vertices and m=(nα) edges, where 1 α 2. The parameter (P) is closely related (but sometimes different) to a parameter δ(P) = S⊂eq V(P) |S|-|N(S)| studied in (Alon 1981) to tightly quantify the maximum number of occurrences of induced subgraphs isomorphic to P. Our results stand in contrast to the lack of a full fine-grained classification of detecting an arbitrary (not necessarily dominating) induced P-pattern.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…