Probing the Star Formation Main Sequence down to 107 M at 1 < z < 9

Abstract

The Main Sequence of Star-Forming Galaxies (SFGMS or MS) is a fundamental scaling relation that provides a global framework for studying galaxy formation and evolution, as well as insight into the complex star formation histories (SFHs) of individual galaxies. In this work, we combine large-area pre-JWST surveys (COSMOS2020, CANDELS), which probe high-M sources (>109\,M), with SHARDS/CANDELS FAINT and JWST data from CANUCS, CEERS, JADES, and UNCOVER, to obtain a high-z, star formation rate (SFR) and stellar mass (M) complete sample spanning both high- and low-M regimes. Completeness in both M and SFR is key to avoiding biases introduced by low-mass, highly star-forming objects. Our combined data set is 80% complete down to 107.6\,M at z1 (108.8\,M at z9). The overall intrinsic MS slope (based on the SFR100 and M derived with Dense Basis and nonparametric SFHs) shows little evolution up to z5, with values 0.7 - 0.8. The slope in the low-M regime becomes steeper than that in the high-M end at least up to z5, but the strength of this change is highly dependent on the assumptions made on the symmetry of the uncertainties in M and SFR. If real, the steepening suggests reduced star formation efficiency or declining gas content with decreasing M. The transition between the low-M regime and the canonical MS occurs around 109.5\,M, independent of z. This critical value may coincide with the assembly of galaxies' disks, which can provide a mechanism for self-regulation that stabilizes them against feedback. The intrinsic scatter is compatible with canonical estimates, also at low-M, ranging from 0.2-0.3 dex. This is indicative of rapid variations in star formation being averaged out over 100 Myr.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…