A Subquadratic Two-Party Communication Protocol for Minimum Cost Flow

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the maximum flow problem in the two-party communication model, where two parties, each holding a subset of edges on a common vertex set, aim to compute the maximum flow of the union graph with minimal communication. We show that this can be solved with O(n1.5) bits of communication, improving upon the trivial O(n2) bound. To achieve this, we derive two additional, more general results: 1. We present a randomized algorithm for linear programs with two-sided constraints that requires O(n1.5k) bits of communication when each constraint has at most k non-zeros. This result improves upon the prior work by [Ghadiri, Lee, Padmanabhan, Swartworth, Woodruff, Ye, STOC'24], which achieves a complexity of O(n2) bits for LPs with one-sided constraints. Upon more precise analysis, their algorithm can reach a bit complexity of O(n1.5 + nk) for one-sided constraint LPs. Nevertheless, for sparse matrices, our approach matches this complexity while extending the scope to two-sided constraints. 2. Leveraging this result, we demonstrate that the minimum cost flow problem, as a special case of solving linear programs with two-sided constraints and as a general case of maximum flow problem, can also be solved with a communication complexity of O(n1.5) bits. These results are achieved by adapting an interior-point method (IPM)-based algorithm for solving LPs with two-sided constraints in the sequential setting by [van den Brand, Lee, Liu, Saranurak, Sidford, Song, Wang, STOC'21] to the two-party communication model. This adaptation utilizes techniques developed by [Ghadiri, Lee, Padmanabhan, Swartworth, Woodruff, Ye, STOC'24] for distributed convex optimization.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…