A GLIMPSE into the very faint-end of the Hβ+[OIII]λλ4960,5008 luminosity function at z=7-9 behind Abell S1063

Abstract

We use the ultra-deep GLIMPSE JWST/NIRCam survey to constrain the faint-end of the Hβ+[OIII]λλ4960,5008 luminosity function (LF) down to 1039 erg/s at z=7-9 behind the lensed Hubble Frontier Field Abell S1063. We perform SED fitting on a Lyman-Break Galaxy sample, measuring combined Hβ+[OIII] fluxes to construct the emission-line LF. The resulting LF (α=-1.55 to -1.78) is flatter than the UV LF (α<-2), indicating a lower number density of low Hβ+[OIII] emitters at fixed MUV. We explore three explanations: (i) bursty star formation histories reducing the Hβ+[OIII]-to-UV ratio, (ii) metallicity effects on [OIII]/Hβ, or (iii) a faint-end turnover in the UV LF. Assuming an evolving [OIII]/Hβ ratio, we derive a flatter [OIII]λ5008 LF (α=-1.45 to -1.66) and a steeper Hβ LF (α=-1.68 to -1.95). The combination of decreasing metallicity and bursty star formation can reconcile the UV and Hβ+[OIII] LF differences. Converting the LF to the ionising photon production rate, we find that galaxies with Hα flux >1039 erg/s (SFR(Hα)>5×10-3 M/yr) contribute 31%-90% and 46%-156% of the ionising photon budget at 7<z<8 and 8<z<9, respectively (for fesc=0.14). The LF shape suggests faint galaxies contribute minimally to the ionising photon production rate. Our cosmic star formation rate density (CSFRD) estimates align with previous work, but GLIMPSE's sensitivity to low SFRs confirms that very faint galaxies are minor contributors to both the ionising photon production rate and the CSFRD. Our results suggest that GLIMPSE has detected the bulk of the total Hβ+[OIII] emission from star-forming galaxies, with fainter sources playing a limited role in cosmic reionisation.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…