On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-Collapsing Measurements
Abstract
We investigate quantum analogues of collision resistance and obtain separations between quantum ``one-way'' and ``collision-resistant'' primitives. 1. Our first result studies one-wayness versus collision-resistance defined over quantum circuits that output classical strings. We show that there is a classical oracle O relative to which (sub-exponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations exist even against adversaries that make quantum queries to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, QO. Very roughly, QO outputs the result of multiple non-collapsing measurements on the output of any quantum O-aided circuit. This rules out fully black-box quantum constructions of Y from X for any X ∈ \indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations, public-key encryption, deniable encryption, oblivious transfer, non-interactive ZK, trapdoor permutations, quantum money\, Y ∈ \collision-resistant hash functions, hard problems in SZK, homomorphic encryption, distributional collision-resistant puzzles\. 2. Our second result studies one-wayness versus collision-resistance defined over quantum states. Here, we show that relative to the same classical oracle O, (sub-exponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation and one-way permutations exist even against adversaries that make quantum queries to a cloning unitary QColO. Very roughly, this latter oracle implements a well-defined, linear operation to clone a subset of the qubits output by any quantum O-aided circuit. This rules out fully black-box constructions of quantum lightning from public-key quantum money.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.