Spatial Variations of Polarized Synchrotron Emission in the QUIJOTE MFI Data using Neural Networks

Abstract

Polarized synchrotron emission from ultra-relativistic electrons spiraling the Galactic magnetic field has become one of the most relevant emissions in the Interstellar medium these last years due to the improvement in the quality of low-frequency observations. One of the recent experiments designed to explore this emission is the QUIJOTE experiment. We aim to study the spatial variations of the synchrotron emission in the QUIJOTE MFI data, by dividing the sky into physically separated regions. For such task, we firstly use a novel component separation method based on artificial neural networks to clean the synchrotron maps. After training the network with simulations, we fit both EE and BB spectra by assuming a power-law model. Then, we give estimations for the index αS, the amplitude, and the ratio between B and E amplitudes. When analyzing the real data, we found a clear spatial variation of the synchrotron properties along the sky at 11 GHz, obtaining a steeper index in the Galactic plane of αSEE = -3.1 0.3 and αSBB = -3.10 0.28 and a flatter one at high Galactic latitudes of αSEE = -3.05 0.16 and αSB = -2.98 0.23. We found average values at all sky of αSEE = -3.04 0.18 and αSBB = -3.00 0.26. Furthermore, after obtaining an average value of ASEE = 3.31 0.17 μK2 and ASBB = 0.93 0.04 μK2, we estimate a ratio between B and E amplitudes of ASBB/ASEE = 0.28 0.06. Based on the results we conclude that, although neural networks seem to be valuable methods to apply on real ISM observations, combined analyses with Planck, WMAP and/or CBASS data are mandatory to reduce the contamination from QUIJOTE maps and then improve the accuracy of the estimations.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…