Fundamental Limits of Coded Caching with Fixed Subpacketization

Abstract

Coded caching is a promising technique to create coded multicast opportunities for cache-aided networks. By splitting each file into F equal packets (i.e., the subpacketization level F) and letting each user cache a set of packets, the transmission load can be significantly reduced via coded multicasting. It has been shown that a higher subpacketization level could potentially lead to a lower transmission load, as more packets can be combined for efficient transmission. On the other hand, a larger F indicates a higher coding complexity and is problematic from a practical perspective when F is extremely large. Despite many works attempting to design coded caching schemes with low subpacketization levels, a fundamental problem remains open: What is the minimum transmission load given any fixed subpacketization level? In this paper, we consider the classical cache-aided networks with identically uncoded placement and one-shot delivery strategy, and investigate the fundamental trade-off between the transmission load and the subpacketization level. We propose a general lower bound on the transmission load for any fixed subpacketization by reformulating the centralized coded caching schemes via the combinatorial structure of the corresponding placement delivery array. The lower bound also recovers existing optimality results for the bipartite graph scheme (including the well-known Maddah-Ali and Niesen (MN) scheme and the conjugate MN scheme) as well as the grouping bipartite graph scheme. Furthermore, by carefully exploiting the combinatorial structure and computing the union size of sorted sets, we establish a new optimality result, i.e., the partition scheme can achieve the optimal rate-subpacketization trade-off.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…