Covering large-dimensional Euclidean spaces by random translates of a given convex body

Abstract

Determining the minimum density of a covering of Rn by Euclidean unit balls as n∞ is a major open problem, with the best known results being the lower bound of (e-3/2+o(1))n by Coxeter, Few and Rogers [Mathematika 6, 1959] and the upper bound of (1/2+o(1) )n n by Dumer [Discrete Comput. Geom. 38, 2007]. We prove that there are ball coverings of Rn attaining the asymptotically best known density (1/2+o(1) )n n such that, additionally, every point of Rn is covered at most (1.79556... + o(1)) n n times. This strengthens the result of Erdos and Rogers [Acta Arith. 7, 1961/62] who had the maximum multiplicity at most (e + o(1)) n n. On the other hand, we show that the method that was used for the best known ball coverings (when one takes a random subset of centres in a fundamental domain of a suitable lattice in Rn and extends this periodically) fails to work if the density is less than (1/2+o(1))n n; in fact, this result remains true if we replace the ball by any convex body K. Also, we observe that a ``worst'' convex body K here is a cube, for which the packing density coming from random constructions is only (1+o(1))n n.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…