A new spectral Tur\'an theorem for weighted graphs and consequences

Abstract

Confirming a conjecture of Elphick and Edwards and strengthening a spectral theorem of Wilf, Nikiforov proved that for any Kr+1-free graph G, λ(G)2 ≤ 2 (1 - 1/r) m, where λ(G) is the spectral radius of G, and m is the number of edges of G. This result was later improved in LiuN26, where it was shown that for any graph G, λ(G)2 ≤ 2 Σe ∈ E(G) cl(e) - 1cl(e), where cl(e) denotes the order of the largest clique containing the edge e. In this paper, we further extend this inequality to weighted graphs, proving that \[ λ(G)2 ≤ 2 Σe ∈ E(G) cl(e) - 1cl(e) w(e)2, \] and we characterize all extremal graphs attaining this bound. Our main theorem yields several new consequences, including two vertex-based and vertex-degree-based local versions of Tur\'an's theorem, as well as weighted generalizations of the Edwards--Elphick theorem and the Cvetkovi\'c theorem, and two localized versions of Wilf's theorems. One of these localized Wilf's theorem confirms a conjecture that originates from Probability and Operator Algebras and was proposed by R. Tripathi independently of us. Moreover, our main result unifies and implies numerous earlier ones from spectral graph theory and extremal graph theory, including Stanley's spectral inequality, Hong's inequality, a localized Tur\'an-type theorem, and a recent extremal theorem by Adak and Chandran. Notably, while Nikiforov's earlier spectral inequality implied Stanley's bound, it did not imply Hong's inequality -- a gap that is now bridged by our result. As a key tool, we establish the inequality Σe ∈ E(G) 2cl(e) ≥ n-1, which complements an upper bound Σe ∈ E(G) 2cl(e)-1 ≤ n2 - 2m due to Bradac, and Malec and Tompkins, independently.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…