Canonical Decompositions and Conditional Dilations of E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-Contraction and E(3; 2; 1, 2)-Contraction
Abstract
A 7-tuple of commuting bounded operators T = (T1, …, T7) defined on a Hilbert space H is said to be a E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction if E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1) is a spectral set for T. Let (S1, S2, S3) and (S1, S2) be tuples of commuting bounded operators on H satisfying Si Sj = Sj Si for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 2. The tuple S = (S1, S2, S3, S1, S2) is called a E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction if E(3; 2; 1, 2) is a spectral set for S. In this paper, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the fundamental operators associated with E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contractions and E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contractions. Furthermore, we obtain a Beurling-Lax-Halmos type representation for invariant subspaces corresponding to a pure E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-isometry and a pure E(3; 2; 1, 2)-isometry. We also construct a conditional dilation for a E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and a E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction and develop an explicit functional model for a certain subclass of these operator tuples. Finally, we demonstrate that every E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction (respectively, E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction) admits a unique decomposition as a direct sum of a E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-unitary (respectively, E(3; 2; 1, 2)-unitary) and a completely non-unitary E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction (respectively, E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction).
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.