Lambda Value-at-Risk under ambiguity and risk sharing

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the Lambda Value-at-Risk () under ambiguity, where the ambiguity is represented by a family of probability measures. We establish that for increasing Lambda functions, the robust (i.e., worst-case) under such an ambiguity set is equivalent to computed with respect to a capacity, a novel extension in the literature. This framework unifies and extends both traditional and Choquet quantiles (Value-at-Risk under ambiguity). We analyze the fundamental properties of this extended risk measure and establish a novel equivalent representation for under capacities with monotone Lambda functions in terms of families of downsets. Moreover, explicit formulas are derived for robust when ambiguity sets are characterized by φ-divergence and the likelihood ratio constraints, respectively. We further explore the applications in risk sharing among multiple agents. We demonstrate that the family of risk measures induced by families of downsets is closed under inf-convolution. In particular, we prove that the inf-convolution of with capacities and monotone Lambda functions is another under a capacity. The explicit forms of optimal allocations are also derived. Moreover, we obtain more explicit results for risk sharing under ambiguity sets characterized by φ-divergence and likelihood ratio constraints. Finally, we explore comonotonic risk-sharing for under ambiguity.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…