Functional Models for E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction, E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction and Tetrablock contraction

Abstract

We obtain various characterizations of the fundamental operators of E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction. We also demonstrate some important relations between the fundamental operators of a E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and a E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction. We describe functional models for pure E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and pure E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction. We give a complete set of unitary invariants for a pure E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and a pure E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction. We demonstrate the functional models for a certain class of completely non-unitary E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction T = (T1, …, T7) and completely non-unitary E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction S = (S1, S2, S3, S1, S2) which satisfy the following conditions: equationCondition 1 aligned &T*iT7 = T7T*i \,\, for \,\, 1 ≤slant i ≤slant 6 aligned equation and equationCondition 2 aligned &S*iS3 = S3S*i, S*jS3 = S3S*j \,\, for \,\, 1 ≤slant i, j ≤slant 2, aligned equation respectively. We also describe a functional model for a completely non-unitary tetrablock contraction T = (A1,A2,P) that satisfies equationCondition 3 aligned A*iP = PA*i \,\, for 1 ≤slant i ≤slant 2. aligned equation By exhibiting counter examples, we show that such abstract model of tetrablock contraction, E(3; 3; 1, 1, 1)-contraction and E(3; 2; 1, 2)-contraction may not exist if we drop the hypothesis of the above equations, respectively..

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…