Quantifying Weighted Morphological Content of Large-Scale Structures via Simulation-Based Inference
Abstract
We perform a simulation-based forecasting analysis to compare the cosmological constraining power of higher-order summary statistics of the large-scale structure, the Minkowski Functionals (MFs) and a class weighted morphological measure known as the Conditional Moments of Derivatives (CMD), with that of the redshift-space halo power spectrum multipoles (PS), with a particular focus on their sensitivity to nonlinear and anisotropic features in redshift space. Our analysis relies on halo catalogs from the Big Sobol Sequence simulations at redshift z=0.5, employing a likelihood-free inference framework implemented via neural posterior estimation. At the fiducial Quijote cosmology and for a Gaussian smoothing scale of R=15\,h-1Mpc, CMD provide systematically tighter constraints than MFs. Combining MFs and CMD into a joint estimator improves the precision by 27\%+9\%-5\% for σ8 and 26\%+7\%-5\% for m relative to MFs alone, highlighting the complementary anisotropy-sensitive information captured by the CMD in contrast to the scalar morphological content encapsulated by the MFs. We compare the combined statistic MFs+CMD with the PS at matched effective scales (k0.16\,h\,Mpc-1) under three halo-selection conditions: all halos, fixed number density, and mass-selected (M>3×1013\,h-1M). In the mass-selected configuration, the (weighted) morphological estimator outperforms the power spectrum by 45\%+20\%-9\% for σ8 and 43\%+10\%-7\% for m. We also extend the simulation-based forecast analysis across a continuous range of cosmological parameters and multiple smoothing scales for morphological measures.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.