Notions of rank and independence in countably categorical theories

Abstract

For an ω-categorical theory T and model M of T we define a hierarchy of ranks, the n-ranks for n < ω which only care about imaginary elements ``up to level n'', where level n contains every element of M and every imaginary element that is an equivalence class of an -definable equivalence relation on n-tuples of elements from M. Using the n-rank we define the notion of n-independence. For all n < ω, the n-independence relation restricted to Mn has all properties of an independence relation according to Kim and Pillay with the possible exception of the symmetry property. We prove that, given any n < ω, if M T and the algebraic closure in Meq restricted to imaginary elements ``up to level n'' which have n-rank 1 (over some set of parameters) satisfies the exchange property, then n-independence is symmetric and hence an independence relation when restricted to Mn. Then we show that if n-independence is symmetric for all n < ω, then T is rosy. An application of this is that if T has weak elimination of imaginaries and the algebraic closure in M restricted to elements of M of 0-rank 1 (over some set of parameters from Meq) satisfies the exchange property, then T is superrosy with finite U-thorn-rank.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…