Nearly tight bounds for MaxCut in hypergraphs
Abstract
An r-cut of a k-uniform hypergraph is a partition of its vertex set into r parts, and the size of the cut is the number of edges which have at least one vertex in each part. The study of the possible size of the largest r-cut in a k-uniform hypergraph was initiated by Erdos and Kleitman in 1968. For graphs, a celebrated result of Edwards states that every m-edge graph has a 2-cut of size m/2+(m1/2), which is sharp. In other words, there exists a cut which exceeds the expected size of a random cut by the order of m1/2. Conlon, Fox, Kwan and Sudakov proved that any k-uniform hypergraph with m edges has an r-cut whose size is (m5/9) larger than the expected size of a random r-cut, provided that k ≥ 4 or r ≥ 3. They further conjectured that this can be improved to (m2/3), which would be sharp. Recently, R\"aty and Tomon improved the bound m5/9 to m3/5-o(1) when r ∈ \ k-1,k\. Using a novel approach, we prove the following approximate version of the Conlon-Fox-Kwan-Sudakov conjecture: for each >0, there is some k0=k0() such that for all k>k0 and 2≤ r≤ k, in every k-uniform hypergraph with m edges there exists an r-cut exceeding the random one by (m2/3-). Moreover, we show that (if k≥ 4 or r≥ 3) every k-uniform linear hypergraph has an r-cut exceeding the random one by (m3/4), which is tight and proves a conjecture of R\"aty and Tomon.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.