Ordinal Analysis of Well-Ordering Principles, Well Quasi-Orders Closure Properties, and n-Collection Schema

Abstract

The study of well quasi-orders, wqo, is a cornerstone of combinatorics and within wqo theory Kruskal's theorem plays a crucial role. Extending previous proof-theoretic results, we calculate the 11 ordinals of two different versions of labelled Kruskal's theorem: ∀ n \, KT(n) and KTω(n); denoting, respectively, all the cases of labelled Kruskal's theorem for trees with an upper bound on the branching degree, and the standard Kruskal's theorem for labelled trees. In order to reach these computations, a key step is to move from Kruskal's theorem, which regards preservation of wqo's, to an equivalent Well-Ordering Principle (WOP), regarding instead preservation of well-orders. Given an ordinal function g, WOP(g) amounts to the following principle ∀ X\, [WO(X) → WO(g(X))], where WO(X) states that ``X is a well-order''. In our case, the two ordinal functions involved are g∀(X)=n(n · X) and gω(X)=(ω\! · X). In addition to the ordinal analysis of Kruskal's theorem and its related WOP, a series of Well Quasi-orders Principles (WQP) is considered. Given a set operation G that preserves the property of being a wqo, its Well Quasi-orders closure Property, WQP(G), is given by the principle ∀ Q\, [Q\, wqo → G(Q)\, wqo]. Conducting this study, unexpected connections with different principles arising from Ramsey and Computational theory, such as RT2<∞, CAC, ADS, RT1<∞, turn up. Lastly, extending and combining previous results, we achieve also the ordinal analysis of the collection schema Bn.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…