On the impact of the supernova subsamples in reducing the Hubble tension
Abstract
The persistent 4-6σ difference between early- and late-time Hubble constant (H0) measurements, known as the "Hubble tension", is a major problem in modern cosmology. We study how differences in colour (c), stretch (x1), and host galaxy properties-stellar mass (M) and specific star formation rate (sSFR)-between calibration and Hubble Flow (HF) Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) samples used by SH0ES affect SN luminosity standardization and H0 estimates. We generate subsamples from both, estimating H0, MB, α, β, host, and σint. We use Kolmogorov-Smirnov to assess the consistency between subsamples and reveal how parameter estimates change as sample matching improves. The calibration sample is not fully representative of the HF sample, especially in M and sSFR. Improving sample consistency leads to changes in H0, MB and σint, though overall values remain broadly stable. Better-matched subsamples tend to yield a mass step consistent with zero within 1σ. By disentangling SN subpopulations, we find persistent differences in H0 (2-3σ) and MB (2σ) between low- and high-stretch SNe: H0 = 75.27 1.18 km s-1 Mpc-1 for low-stretch and H0 = 71.25 1.59 km s-1 Mpc-1 for high-stretch, resulting in Hubble tensions of 6.07σ and 2.52σ. These differences suggest SNe Ia subpopulations with varying dust and intrinsic colour not captured by a single β, impacting cosmology. Estimating a single H0 for both subpopulations yields H0 = 73.78 2.17 km s-1 Mpc-1, with a much larger uncertainty that lowers the Hubble tension from 5.87σ to 2.86σ. Our results suggest that the mass step may arise from an over-correction of more than one SN subpopulation associated to different environments.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.