Extrinsic Total-Variance and Coplanarity via Oriented and Classical Projective Shape Analysis

Abstract

Projective shape analysis provides a geometric framework for studying digital images acquired by pinhole digital cameras. In the classical projective shape (PS) method, landmark configurations are represented in (2)k-4, where k is the number of landmarks observed. This representation is invariant under the action of the full projective group on this space and is sign-blind, so opposite directions in 3 determine the same projective point and front--back orientation of a surface is not recorded. Oriented projective shape () restores this information by working on a product of k-4 spheres 2 instead of projective space and restricting attention to the orientation-preserving subgroup of projective transformations. In this paper we introduce an extrinsic total-variance index for OPS, resulting in the extrinsic Fr\'echet framework for the m dimensional case from the inclusion :(m)q(m+1)q,q=k-m-2. In the planar pentad case (m=2, q=1) the sample total extrinsic variance has a closed form in terms of the mean of a random sample of size n of oriented projective coordinates in S2. As an illustration, using an oriented projective frame, we analyze the Sope Creek stone data set, a benchmark and nearly planar example with 41 images and 5 landmarks. Using a delta-method applied to a large sample and a generalized Slutsky theorem argument, for an OPS leave-two-out diagnostic, one identifies coplanarity at the 5\% level, confirming the concentrated data coplanarity PS result in Patrangenaru(2001)Patrangenaru2001.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…