Performance comparison of 802.11mc and 802.11az Wi-Fi Fine Time Measurement protocols
Abstract
The need for meter level location accuracy is driving increased adoption of 802.11 mc/az Fine Time Measurement (FTM) based ranging in Wi-Fi networks. In this paper, we present a comparative study of the ranging accuracy of 802.11mc and 802.11az protocols. We examine by real world measurements the critical parameters that influence the accuracy of FTM viz., channel width, interference, radio environment, and offset calibration. The measurements demonstrate that meter-level ranging accuracy can be consistently attained in line of sight environment on 80 MHz and 160 MHz channels, while an accuracy of about 5m is obtained in non-line of sight environment. It is observed that the 802.11az protocol is capable of providing better accuracy than 802.11mc even in a multipath heavy environment.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.