On Universal Graphs for Trees and Tree-Like Graphs
Abstract
Chung and Graham [J. London Math. Soc. 1983] claimed to prove that there exists an n-vertex graph G with 52n 2 n + O(n) edges that contains every n-vertex tree as a subgraph. Frati, Hoffmann and T\'oth [Combin. Probab. Comput. 2023] discovered an error in the proof. By adding more edges to G the error can be corrected, bringing the number of edges in G to 72n 2 n + O(n). We make the first improvement to Chung and Graham's bound in over four decades by showing that there exists an n-vertex graph with 145n 2 n + O(n) edges that contains every n-vertex tree as a subgraph. Furthermore, we generalise this bound for treewidth-k graphs by showing that there exists a graph with O(kn(n/k+1)) edges that contains every n-vertex treewidth-k graph as a subgraph. This is best possible in the sense that (kn(n/k+1)) edges are required.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.